Check the client log(s). Michael Colonno <mcolonno at stanford.edu> wrote: > Forgot to mention: on a client system (not a brick) the >glusterfs process is consuming ~ 68% CPU continuously. This is a much >less >powerful desktop system so the CPU load can't be compared 1:1 with the >systems comprising the bricks but still very high. So the issue seems >to >exist with both glusterfsd and glusterfs processes. > > > > Thanks, > > ~Mike C. > > > >From: gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org >[mailto:gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org] On Behalf Of Michael Colonno >Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 12:46 PM >To: gluster-users at gluster.org >Subject: high CPU load on all bricks > > > > Gluster gurus ~ > > > > I've deployed and 8-brick (2x replicate) Gluster 3.3.1 volume on >CentOS 6.3 with tcp transport. I was able to build, start, mount, and >use >the volume. On each system contributing a brick, however, my CPU usage >(glusterfsd) is hovering around 20% (virtually zero memory usage >thankfully). These are brand new, fairly beefy servers so 20% CPU load >is >quite a bit. The deployment is pretty plain with each brick mounting >the >volume to itself via a glusterfs mount. I assume this type of CPU usage >is >atypically high; is there anything I can do to investigate what's >soaking up >CPU and minimize it? Total usable volume size is only about 22 TB >(about 45 >TB total with 2x replicate). > > > > Thanks, > > ~Mike C. > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >Gluster-users mailing list >Gluster-users at gluster.org >http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20130201/092986de/attachment.html>