Hi Kane, 1. Which version of samba are you running? 2. Can you re-run the test after adding the following lines to smb.conf's global section and tell if it helps? kernel oplocks = no stat cache = no Thanks, Raghavendra Talur On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 3:48 PM, kane <stef_9k at 163.com> wrote: > Hi Lala, thank you for reply this issue. > > this is our smb.conf: > -------- > [global] > workgroup = MYGROUP > server string = DCS Samba Server > log file = /var/log/samba/log.vfs > max log size = 500000 > # log level = 10 > # max xmit = 65535 > # getwd cache = yes > # use sendfile = yes > # strict sync = no > # sync always = no > # large readwrite = yes > aio read size = 262144 > aio write size = 262144 > aio write behind = true > # min receivefile size = 262144 > write cache size = 268435456 > # oplocks = yes > security = user > passdb backend = tdbsam > load printers = yes > cups options = raw > read raw = yes > write raw = yes > max xmit = 262144 > read size = 262144 > socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_RCVBUF=262144 > SO_SNDBUF=262144 > max protocol = SMB2 > > [homes] > comment = Home Directories > browseable = no > writable = yes > > > [printers] > comment = All Printers > path = /var/spool/samba > browseable = no > guest ok = no > writable = no > printable = yes > > [cifs] > path = /mnt/fuse > guest ok = yes > writable = yes > > [raw] > path = /dcsdata/d0 > guest ok = yes > writable = yes > > [gvol] > comment = For samba export of volume test > vfs objects = glusterfs > glusterfs:volfile_server = localhost > glusterfs:volume = soul > path = / > read only = no > guest ok = yes > -------- > > our win 7 client hardware: > Intel? Xeon? E31230 @ 3.20GHz > 8GB RAM > > linux client hardware: > Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3430 @ 2.40GHz > 16GB RAM > > pretty thanks > > -kane > > ? 2013-8-21???4:53?Lalatendu Mohanty <lmohanty at redhat.com> ??? > > On 08/21/2013 01:32 PM, kane wrote: > > Hello? > > We have used glusterfs3.4 with the lasted samba-glusterfs-vfs lib to > test samba performance in windows client. > > two glusterfs server nodes export share with name of "gvol": > hardwares: > brick use a raid 5 logic disk with 8 * 2T SATA HDDs > 10G network connection > > one linux client mount the "gvol" with cmd: > [root at localhost current]# mount.cifs //192.168.100.133/gvol /mnt/vfs -o > user=kane,pass=123456 > > then i use iozone to test the write performance in mount dir "/mnt/vfs": > [root at localhost current]# ./iozone -s 10G -r 128k -i0 -t 4 > ?.. > File size set to 10485760 KB > Record Size 128 KB > Command line used: ./iozone -s 10G -r 128k -i0 -t 4 > Output is in Kbytes/sec > Time Resolution = 0.000001 seconds. > Processor cache size set to 1024 Kbytes. > Processor cache line size set to 32 bytes. > File stride size set to 17 * record size. > Throughput test with 4 processes > Each process writes a 10485760 Kbyte file in 128 Kbyte records > > Children see throughput for 4 initial writers = 487376.67 KB/sec > Parent sees throughput for 4 initial writers = 486184.67 KB/sec > Min throughput per process = 121699.91 KB/sec > Max throughput per process = 122005.73 KB/sec > Avg throughput per process = 121844.17 KB/sec > Min xfer = 10459520.00 KB > > Children see throughput for 4 rewriters = 491416.41 KB/sec > Parent sees throughput for 4 rewriters = 490298.11 KB/sec > Min throughput per process = 122808.87 KB/sec > Max throughput per process = 122937.74 KB/sec > Avg throughput per process = 122854.10 KB/sec > Min xfer = 10474880.00 KB > > linux client mount with cifs , write performance reach 480MB/s per > client; > > but when i use win7 client mount the "gvol" with cmd: > net use Z: \\192.168.100.133\gvol 123456 /user:kane > > then also use iozone test in dir Z, even with write block 1Mbyte : > File size set to 10485760 KB > Record Size 1024 KB > Command line used: iozone -s 10G -r 1m -i0 -t 4 > Output is in Kbytes/sec > Time Resolution = -0.000000 seconds. > Processor cache size set to 1024 Kbytes. > Processor cache line size set to 32 bytes. > File stride size set to 17 * record size. > Throughput test with 4 processes > Each process writes a 10485760 Kbyte file in 1024 Kbyte records > > Children see throughput for 4 initial writers = 148164.82 > KB/sec > Parent sees throughput for 4 initial writers = 148015.48 KB/sec > Min throughput per process = 37039.91 KB/sec > Max throughput per process = 37044.45 KB/sec > Avg throughput per process = 37041.21 KB/sec > Min xfer = 10484736.00 KB > > Children see throughput for 4 rewriters = 147642.12 > KB/sec > Parent sees throughput for 4 rewriters = 147472.16 KB/sec > Min throughput per process = 36909.13 KB/sec > Max throughput per process = 36913.29 KB/sec > Avg throughput per process = 36910.53 KB/sec > Min xfer = 10484736.00 KB > > iozone test complete. > > then reach 140MB/s > > so , anyone meet with this problem.Is there win7 clinet to reconfigure > to perform well? > > Thanks! > > kane > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Email: kai.zhou at soulinfo.com > ??: 0510-85385788-616 > > > > Hi kane, > > I do run IOs using win7 client with glusterfs3.4 , but I never compared > the performance with Linux cifs mount. I don't think we need to do any > special configuration on Windows side. I hope your Linux and Windows client > have similar configuration i.e. RAM, cache, disk type etc. However I am > curious to know if your setup uses the vfs plug-in correctly. We can > confirm that looking at smb.conf entry for the gluster volume which should > have been created by "gluster start command" automatically . > > e.g: entry in smb.conf for one of volume "smbvol" of mine looks like below > > [gluster-smbvol] > comment = For samba share of volume smbvol > vfs objects = glusterfs > glusterfs:volume = smbvol > path = / > read only = no > guest ok = yes > > Kindly copy the entries in smb.conf for your gluster volume in this email. > -Lala > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing listGluster-users at gluster.orghttp://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > -- *Raghavendra Talur * -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20130822/a0b4f98e/attachment-0001.html>
