Looking at the answers of the post: (...) Gluster 3.2 is known to use only since HCA for the transport right now over RDMA. RDMA codebase AFAIK doesn't use two HCA communication points to do RDMA for the time being. (...) It seems as a "limitation" in gluster implementation. I guess using IP as transport will enable bonding...would it be a workaround? Thank you for the provided answers, Samuel. On 21 September 2012 12:41, Fernando Frediani (Qube) < fernando.frediani at qubenet.net> wrote: > Well, it actually says it is a limitation of the Infiniband driver so > nothing with Gluster I guess. If the driver allow then in theory should not > be a problem for Gluster.**** > > > Fernando**** > > ** ** > > *From:* gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org [mailto: > gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org] *On Behalf Of *samuel > *Sent:* 21 September 2012 10:56 > *To:* gluster-users at gluster.org > *Subject:* infiniband bonding**** > > ** ** > > Hi folks, > > Reading this post: > http://community.gluster.org/q/port-bonding-link-aggregation-transport-rdma-ib-verbs/ > > It says that gluster 3.2 does not support bonding of infiniband ports. > > Does anyone knows whether 3.3 has changed this limitation? Is there any > other place where to find information about this subject? > > Thanks in advance! > > Samuel.**** > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20120921/12a34670/attachment-0001.htm>
