On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Anand Avati <anand.avati at gmail.com> wrote: > There have been far too many instances where users delete a volume, but fail > to understand that those brick directories still contain their data I think this is kinda the point though. Why would the user expect the brick to still contain their data? They just issued a 'delete' command (granted, it's a delete volume, not delete brick). What's an example scenario where I would actually *want* the brick to be maintained when I add it to a new volume? -- Douglas J Hunley (doug.hunley at gmail.com) Twitter: @hunleyd Web: douglasjhunley.com G+: http://goo.gl/sajR3
