I was under the impression that self-mounting NFS of any kind (mount -t nfs localhost...) was a dangerous thing. When I did that with gNFS I could cause a server to crash in no time at all with a simple dd into the mount point. I was under the impression that kNFS would have the same problem though I have not tested in myself (this was discussed in #gluster on irc.freenode.net some time ago). I'm guessing this would be a bug in the kernel. Has anyone seen issues or crashes with locally mounted NFS (either gNFS or kNFS)? Jeff White - GNU+Linux Systems Administrator University of Pittsburgh - CSSD On 09/14/2012 03:22 PM, John Mark Walker wrote: > A note on recent history: > > There were past attempts to export GlusterFS client mounts over NFS, but those used the GlusterFS NFS service. I believe this is the first instance "in the wild" of someone trying this with knfsd. > > With the former, while there was increased performance, there would invariably be race conditions that would lock up GlusterFS. See the ominous warnings posted on this Q&A thread: http://community.gluster.org/a/nfs-performance-with-fuse-client-redundancy/ > > I am curious to see if using knfsd, as opposed to GlusterFS' NFS service, yields a long-term solution for this type of workload. Please do continue to keep us updated. > > Thanks, > JM > > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> Well, it was too clever for me too :) - someone else suggested it >> when I was >> describing some of the options we were facing. I admit to initially >> thinking >> that it was silly to expect better performance by stacking protocols, >> but we >> tried it and it seems to have worked. >> >> To your point: >> >> the 'client' is the end node that uses the gluster storage - in our >> case it's >> a compute node (w/ limited storage) in a research cluster. >> >> the 'server' is the collection of nodes that provides the gluster >> storage. >> >> the client mounts the server with the native gluster client, >> providing all the >> gluster advantages of single namespace, scalability, reliability, >> etc. to >> 'client:/glmount' >> >> the client then exports that gluster fs via NFS to itself, so >> 'client:/glmount' is listed in '/etc/exports' as rw to itself. >> >> the client then mounts itself (innuendo and disturbing mental images >> notwithstanding) via NFS: >> 'mount -t nfs localhost:/glmount /glnfs' >> so that the gluster fs (/glmount) is NFS-loopback-mounted on the >> client >> (itself): >> >> from our test case, simplified: >> ----------------------------------- >> hmangala at claw5:~ >> $ cat /etc/mtab # (all non-gluster-related entries deleted) >> ... >> pbs1ib:/gli /glmount fuse.glusterfs \ >> rw,default_permissions,allow_other,max_read=131072 0 0 >> ... >> claw5:/glmount /glnfs nfs rw,addr=10.255.78.4 0 0 >> ... >> ----------------------------------- >> >> in the above extract, pbs1ib:/gli is the gluster fs that is mounted >> to >> 'claw5:/glmount'. >> >> claw5 then NFS-mounts claw5:/glmount onto /glnfs which users actually >> use to >> read/write. >> >> I agree, not very intuitive... but it seems to work. >> >> This is with NFS3 clients. NFS4 may provide an additional perf boost >> by >> allowing clients to work out of cache until it's forced to sync, but >> we >> haven't tried that yet and the test methodology we used wouldn't show >> a gain >> anyway. I'll have to try to create a more realistic test harness. >> >> >> hjm >> >> On Friday, September 14, 2012 01:04:59 PM Whit Blauvelt wrote: >>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 09:41:42AM -0700, harry mangalam wrote: >>>>>> What I mean: >>>>>> - mounting a gluster fs via the native client, >>>>>> - then NFS-exporting the gluster fs to the client itself >>>>>> - then mounting that gluster fs via NFS3 to take advantage of >>>>>> the >>>>>> client-side caching. >>> Harry, >>> >>> What is "the client itself" here? I'm having trouble picturing >>> what's doing >>> what with what. No doubt because it's too clever for me. Maybe a >>> bit more >>> description would clarify it nonetheless. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Whit >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Gluster-users mailing list >>> Gluster-users at gluster.org >>> http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >> -- >> Harry Mangalam - Research Computing, OIT, Rm 225 MSTB, UC Irvine >> [m/c 2225] / 92697 Google Voice Multiplexer: (949) 478-4487 >> 415 South Circle View Dr, Irvine, CA, 92697 [shipping] >> MSTB Lat/Long: (33.642025,-117.844414) (paste into Google Maps) >> -- >> What does it say about a society that would rather send its >> children to kill and die for oil than to get on a bike? >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gluster-users mailing list >> Gluster-users at gluster.org >> http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >> > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users