Did you compile with the readline lib? I wonder if that adds a buffer... On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 10:23 PM, John Jolet <jjolet at drillinginfo.com> wrote: > I hate it that there's no buffer. > I usually do gluster commands at the command line instead of interactively. Use the bash buffer that way > > Sent from my PANTECH Element? on AT&T > > Jules Wang <lancelotds at 163.com> wrote: > > > hi, Eric: > You may find this thread useful: > http://gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2012-August/011207.html > > Best Regards. > Jules Wang. > At 2012-09-06 08:13:25,Eric <epretorious at yahoo.com> wrote: > > I've noticed that when interacting with the Gluster Console Manager... > > * Commands are quite lengthy most of the time. > * Some commands (e.g., commands that check the status of an operation) > get used over-and-over. > > So, before I submit a feature request, I thought that I'd ask first if > others might find the feature useful: Would other admin's also find it > useful for the Console Manager to maintain a history buffer so that > commands can be retrieved, edited, and/or re-used? > > Eric Pretorious > Truckee, CA > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20120905/b5fdb6c7/attachment.htm>
