'replace-brick' - why we plan to deprecate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



hi Amar,
I met across a problem when I replace a brick in a stripe-replicate volume.
I used both methods you mentioned in your post.
#gluster volume replace-brick <VOL> brick1 brick2 start [1]
# gluster volume replace-brick <VOL> brick1 brick2 commit force
(self-heal daemon heals the data)

the message shows that brick1 doesn't in the volume.
I checked the volume info ,and it real exists there.
Any idea or advise?
Thanks

Jeff


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying attachment(s) 
is intended only for the use of the intended recipient and may be confidential and/or privileged of 
Neusoft Corporation, its subsidiaries and/or its affiliates. If any reader of this communication is 
not the intended recipient, unauthorized use, forwarding, printing,  storing, disclosure or copying 
is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful.If you have received this communication in error,please 
immediately notify the sender by return e-mail, and delete the original message and all copies from 
your system. Thank you. 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20121017/8967948a/attachment-0001.html>


[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux