On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 08:55:18AM -0600, Israel Shirk wrote: > I'm simply saying that I keep hearing that Gluster is supposed to work great on > distributed applications (as in distributed to more than one place), but the > reality of the situation is that it's really buggy and nobody is willing to > acknowledge it. There are big problems with using Gluster in this way, and I > can't see that being the case when it's being tested for this. Israel, you need to distinguish between LAN and WAN. Gluster's normal replication is for LAN. Gluster's geo-replication is for WAN. Now, I don't know where you "keep hearing that Gluster is supposed to work great" using normal replication over a WAN. But it's not from anyone close to the project. So you shouldn't complain to the project about this. You might suggest a correction to whoever you're hearing it from, though, especially if they're saying something so misleading in print or a blog where others may get confused by it. Best, Whit
