3.2.6 or 3.3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

I did all my testing with 3.2.6, but went into production with 3.3 (with minimal testing).  I'm happy with it.

Gerald


----- Original Message -----
> From: "Frank Sonntag" <f.sonntag at metocean.co.nz>
> To: "gluster-users" <gluster-users at gluster.org>
> Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2012 2:37:48 AM
> Subject: 3.2.6 or 3.3
> 
> Hello list,
> 
> We have been using 3.2.6 the last few months and are reasonably happy
> with it.
> I am about to build a new file server (to replace the existing
> solution) and now have to decide to either stick with 3.2.6 (because
> we know it works) or upgrade to 3.3.
> Main use will be a few distributed, replicated volumes on two servers
> with maybe a dozen or so clients.
> Secondary use will be a distributed volume spread over all machines.
> 
> What are people's experiences with 3.2.6 vs 3.3? Would you recommend
> 3.3 for operational use?
> 
> Thanks,
> Frank
> 
> 
> Frank Sonntag
> Meteorologist, MetOcean Solutions Ltd
> PO Box 441, New Plymouth, New Zealand 4340
> T: +64 7-825 0540
> M: +64 21-0245 2275
> f.sonntag .A.T. metocean.co.nz
> http://www.metocean.co.nz
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> 


[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux