worth upgrading from 3.2.7 to 3.3.1?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Well, if you read the mailing list in the past weeks you see some people
who have problems with vms on gluster.

http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2012-July/033752.html
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842254
http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2012-September/034298.html

My experience shows that it most of the time happens with large instances
(disk file > 50gb) and under I/O load.
The question is, how to debug such a scenario?



2012/11/27 Gerald Brandt <gbr at majentis.com>

>
> >
> > Hi Whit, To be honest, I don't see any improvements since 3.2
> > concerning virtual machines (maybe under the hood?). Self-heal is
> > still blocking and performance is not better.
> > We've waited over 6 months for the 3.3 release and it was really
> > disappointing for me personally.
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Christian
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> Something is seriously wrong there.  I just rebuilt a RAID, with complete
> loss of data.  GlusterFS self healed/replicated with no stutters or
> downtime to the 23 VM's I run on the Gluster mirror.
>
> Gerald
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20121128/ba7b2ee6/attachment-0001.html>


[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux