I would check my hardware then. With 3.3.1 I have self-healed vm images, and replaced bricks in the vm image volume both with and without migration - all while timing reading and writing files twice the size of the vm memory allocation. Not only was there no pause, but it didn't even slow down. Christian Wittwer <wittwerch at gmail.com> wrote: >Hi Whit, >To be honest, I don't see any improvements since 3.2 concerning virtual >machines (maybe under the hood?). Self-heal is still blocking and >performance is not better. >We've waited over 6 months for the 3.3 release and it was really >disappointing for me personally. > >Cheers, >Christian > > >2012/11/27 Whit Blauvelt <whit.gluster at transpect.com> > >> Gerald, >> >> How's the VM's on Gluster thing working? Stable? Fast enough where >speed's >> not essential? >> >> Thanks, >> Whit >> >> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 09:36:24AM -0600, Gerald Brandt wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I have speed and stability increases with 3.3.0/3.3.1. If you're >> running VM's on gluster, it's a no brainer as well. >> > >> > Gerald >> _______________________________________________ >> Gluster-users mailing list >> Gluster-users at gluster.org >> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >> > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >Gluster-users mailing list >Gluster-users at gluster.org >http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20121127/0c3e91a8/attachment-0001.html>
