gluster Performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9 May 2012, at 11:35, Arnold Krille wrote:

> So while 
> reading big files from local fuse-mount is fast, reading many small files still 
> has the network-penalty of any distributed and/or replicated system.

That's fair, however network latency shouldn't have *that* big an effect - memcached is all about the network, yet it has no trouble sustaining > 100k requests/sec per node. I even get similar performance using na?vely-replicated sharedance which does hit disk and talks to multiple nodes.

Marcus
-- 
Marcus Bointon
Synchromedia Limited: Creators of http://www.smartmessages.net/
UK info at hand CRM solutions
marcus at synchromedia.co.uk | http://www.synchromedia.co.uk/





[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux