> I'm sorry if the release didn't address the specific features you need, > and I'm sorry if we gave the impression that it would. Our additional > features for 3.3 were always pretty clear, or so I thought. If you can > find any statements from the past year that were misleading, I would be > happy to address them directly, but your statement above was a bit vague. John Mark, Please consider my comments in the context of Amar's comment, which I quoted above it: On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:09:39AM +0530, Amar Tumballi wrote: > I saw that mail and I agree that the target of 3.3.0 was to make > glusterfs more stable and get the features which would make Virtual > machine hosting on GlusterFS a possibility by 3.4.0 time-frame. Does that not seem to say that virtual machine hosting is not really to be a possibility before the 3.4.0 time-frame? From subsequent responses, including yours, Amar likely misspoke. Excuse me for responding to a message that seemed to be saying that Gluster won't be fully ready for VM hosting before 3.4.0. Regards, Whit
