Dear All, I tested the GlusterFS 3.2.6 on CentOS 5.8. It was good performance. But some troubles are occurring on GlusterFS 3.2.7 and CentOS 6.2... I can write files and make directories. But, the trouble is when I use 'ls' command, some files become invisible and often ls command could not return. To show it, I tried to make the trouble on one host. It likes as following: ---Create volume gluster> volume info Volume Name: v1 Type: Distribute Status: Started Number of Bricks: 3 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1: host14:/mnt/a1 Brick2: host14:/mnt/a2 Brick3: host14:/mnt/a3 ---Mount above volume [kk at host14 /mnt]$ sudo mount -t glusterfs host14:v1 /mnt/v1 ---Create a file in the mounted directory but it becomes invisible for ls command, but there is it in brick [kk at host14 /mnt]$ cd v1 [kk at host14 v1]$ ls [kk at host14 v1]$ touch a [kk at host14 v1]$ ls [kk at host14 v1]$ ls ../a? ../a1: ../a2: a ../a3: [kk at host14 v1]$ rm a [kk at host14 v1]$ ls ../a? ../a1: ../a2: ../a3: ---Create some files but it becomes to not return for ls command [kk at host14 v1]$ touch a b c d e [kk at host14 v1]$ ls ../a? ../a1: d ../a2: a c ../a3: b e [kk at host14 v1]$ ls [Here, I need to kill the process from other console.] Killed [kk at host14 v1]$ For this no return, I confirmed that a "glusterfs" and three "glusterfsd" processes have high CPU load after 'ls' command run. If the volume has two bricks, this trouble doesn't occur. I can understand that this situation is too strange. So I am thinking there is something simple mistake for setting on my system. I checked log files, but I could not find the clue to solve. If anybody knows about this, could you please tell me? Best regards, K. Kondo