Hello Avati, Thanks for your quick response. I had planned to upgrade to 3.3 at some point, mainly to take advantage of the NFS memory leak fix. I am worried about upgrading after bad experiences with 3.1.0 and 3.2.0. Does anyone have any experience of upgrading from 3.2.6 to 3.3.0? -Dan. On 07/16/2012 08:21 PM, Anand Avati wrote: > There were a lot of changes in NFS filehandle management in 3.3.0. Can > you check if these performance issue has been addressed with those > changes? > > Avati > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Dan Bretherton > <d.a.bretherton at reading.ac.uk <mailto:d.a.bretherton at reading.ac.uk>> > wrote: > > Dear All, > I am having a lot of trouble accessing GlusterFS 3.2.6 volumes > from Solaris 10 NFS clients. Volumes can be mounted but I/O > performance is so poor that the volumes are practically unusable. > Doing cd or ls can take a very long time and often hangs, with > repeated errors like the following. > > mars etc # cd /users/rle > NFS server glusterfs not responding still trying > NFS server glusterfs ok > > I am using the mount options recommended in the GlusterFS 3.2 > Administration Guide. I also tried adding mount options > rsize=32768,wsize=32768 but it didn't seem to make any difference. > These are fixed mounts; automount doesn't work at all with > GlusterFS volumes on Solaris 10. I have no performance problems > with my Linux NFS clients. Can anyone suggest a way to improve > GlusterFS access from Solaris 10? > > Regards, > Dan. > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org <mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org> > http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20120716/b34575ef/attachment.htm>
