Say, is it possible to compile a kernel without whatever part of its NFS support competes with Gluster's locking? Whit On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 08:14:27AM -0400, Rajesh Amaravathi wrote: > I hope you do realize that two NLM implementations of the same version > cannot operate simultaneously in the same machine. I really look forward > to a solution to make this work, that'd be something. > > Regards, > Rajesh Amaravathi, > Software Engineer, GlusterFS > RedHat Inc. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David Coulson" <david at davidcoulson.net> > To: "Rajesh Amaravathi" <rajesh at redhat.com> > Cc: "Tomasz Chmielewski" <mangoo at wpkg.org>, "Gluster General Discussion List" <gluster-users at gluster.org> > Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 5:28:04 PM > Subject: Re: NFS mounts with glusterd on localhost - reliable or not? > > Was that introduced by the same person who thought that binding to > sequential ports down from 1024 was a good idea? > > Considering how hard RedHat was pushing Gluster at the Summit a week or > two ago, it seems like they're making it hard for people to really > implement it in any capacity other than their Storage Appliance product. > > Luckily I don't need locking yet, but I suppose RedHat will be happy > when I do since I'll need to buy more GFS2 Add-Ons for my environment :-) > > David > > On 7/13/12 7:49 AM, Rajesh Amaravathi wrote: > > Actually, if you want to mount *any* nfs volumes(of Gluster) OR > > exports (of kernel-nfs-server), you cannot do it with locking on > > a system where a glusterfs(nfs process) is running(since 3.3.0). > > However, if its ok to mount without locking, then you should be > > able to do it on localhost. > > > > Regards, > > Rajesh Amaravathi, > > Software Engineer, GlusterFS > > RedHat Inc. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "David Coulson" <david at davidcoulson.net> > > To: "Tomasz Chmielewski" <mangoo at wpkg.org> > > Cc: "Rajesh Amaravathi" <rajesh at redhat.com>, "Gluster General Discussion List" <gluster-users at gluster.org> > > Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 3:16:38 PM > > Subject: Re: NFS mounts with glusterd on localhost - reliable or not? > > > > > > On 7/13/12 5:29 AM, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: > >> Killing the option to use NFS mounts on localhost is certainly quite > >> the opposite to my performance needs! > >> > > He was saying you can't run kernel NFS server and gluster NFS server at > > the same time, on the same host. There is nothing stopping you from > > mounting localhost:/volume on all your boxes. That is exactly how our > > 3.2.5 and 3.3.0 environments access volumes for the performance reasons > > you identified. > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
