NFS mounts with glusterd on localhost - reliable or not?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/13/2012 05:46 PM, David Coulson wrote:
>
> On 7/13/12 5:29 AM, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
>>
>> Killing the option to use NFS mounts on localhost is certainly quite
>> the opposite to my performance needs!
>>
>
> He was saying you can't run kernel NFS server and gluster NFS server at
> the same time, on the same host. There is nothing stopping you from
> mounting localhost:/volume on all your boxes. That is exactly how our
> 3.2.5 and 3.3.0 environments access volumes for the performance reasons
> you identified.

OK, but it deadlocks when we write, unless we use "sync" option, which 
hurts the performance.


As mentioned by Rajesh Amaravathi:

	"This is a problem generic to fuse/userspace filesystems."


Mid term, are there any plans to deal with this problem?

I understand the fix may need to be partially done on the kernel side, 
but it would be very beneficial to glusterfs.


-- 
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://www.ptraveler.com


[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux