Best practices?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/24/2012 01:18 PM, John Mark Walker wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> Aside from this, carving a storage system into 16TB chunks is a
>> terrible
>> thing to do to a large file system capable unit.  ext4 (if you follow
>> the previous link) still really doesn't do 16TB+ stably.  Things
>> break.
>>    It will eventually get there, but its not there now.  xfs has been
>> doing large file systems for more than a decade.
>>
>
> Well said. And someday, btrfs will be a worthy option as well.

There is this brand spanking new btrfsck !  Though there are the 
occasional "OMG IT ATE MY FILE SYSTEM" posts to the list, which ... 
while helpful to the devs, won't inspire confidence yet ...

... but it will get there.

>
> -JM


-- 
Joseph Landman, Ph.D
Founder and CEO
Scalable Informatics Inc.
email: landman at scalableinformatics.com
web  : http://scalableinformatics.com
        http://scalableinformatics.com/sicluster
phone: +1 734 786 8423 x121
fax  : +1 866 888 3112
cell : +1 734 612 4615



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux