On Friday 17 February 2012 06:59:40 Thomas Jackson wrote: > Just as a small warning, Sheepdog is well away from being production ready - > the big problem that I can see is that it won't de-allocate blocks once an > image is deleted! It definitely has promise for the future though. To add to this: ceph and xtreemfs are at the same stage. ceph lost part of my test-data and xtreemfs was slow and unstable and hung up my system two or three times. Drbd+gfs2 proved slow and unworkable without node-fencing. Gluster at least didn't result in any kernel-panics (yet) despite my very "unstable" setup with only one of three nodes running full-time... Have fun, Arnold -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <http://gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20120216/d3515aef/attachment.pgp>
