On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 4:06 AM, Amar Tumballi <amarts at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Wanted to check if any one is using gluster CLI output of 'peer status' in > their scripts/programs? If yes, let me know. If not, we are trying to make > it more script friendly. > > For example the current output would look something like: > > ----- > Hostname: 10.70.36.7 > Uuid: c7283ee7-0e8d-4cb8-8552-**a63ab05deaa7 > State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) > > Hostname: 10.70.36.6 > Uuid: 5a2fdeb3-e63e-4e56-aebe-**8b68a5abfcef > State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) > > ----- > > New changes would make it look like : > > ------- > UUID Hostname Status > c7283ee7-0e8d-4cb8-8552-**a63ab05deaa7 10.70.36.7 Connected > 5a2fdeb3-e63e-4e56-aebe-**8b68a5abfcef 10.70.36.6 Connected > > ------- > > If anyone has better format, or want more information, let us know now. I > would keep timeout for this mail as 3 more working days, and without any > response, we will go ahead with the change. > > I suggest we retain the current output of 'gluster peer status' as-is and implement the above proposed format in the output of 'gluster --mode=script peer status' (perhaps make it even more script friendly?). Since --mode=script is already a support cli switch it would be ideal to include this change under that itself. Handling of --xml would be independent issue. If there are suggestions to the desired output format of 'gluster --mode=script peer status' from the users, it would be good to bring it up now. Avati -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20120828/d9a495a8/attachment.htm>
