On Tue, 2012-08-28 at 12:51 -0600, Joe Topjian wrote: > Hi Pranith, > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri > <pkarampu at redhat.com> wrote: > Why not use --xml at the end of the command? That will > print the output in xml format. Would that make it easy to > parse?. > > > IMO, I can see --xml being useful for more "sophisticated" scripts > that utilize Perl, Python, or Ruby, however, for quick shell > scripting, I can see this being very difficult if not unusable. FWIW: I tend to agree on this point. The other question that comes to mind is what "quick" bash scripts are you writing for managing gluster? Get curious, James > > > Having the output print in set columns, though might wrap when printed > on <=80 char terminals, would make it very easy to parse with awk. > > > Thanks, > Joe > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20120828/e59f00cb/attachment.pgp>
