On 08/06/2012 12:01 AM, Amar Tumballi wrote: > We are in the process of improving our log messages, and message > outputs through CLI. As a first step, we want to make sure our CLI > outputs are both meaningful and script friendly (for people who want > to use the CLI output in their scripts). > > We are taking few baby steps in this regard in upstream (master > branch). I recently sent a patch http://review.gluster.com/3753 which > tries to separate out most of the error messages by outputting it to > stderr instead of stdout. > > In the meantime, I tried to keep it script friendly too. With that > patch going in, the problem is, if any of you have written scripts > which greps for specific pattern in the CLI output, will be broken > when the next major release happens. > > So, I want your feed back on getting it right by involving you all to > make the messages more friendlier to both script writers, and also to > admins who would understand the messages properly. (ie, meaning of the > messages should be unambiguous). Amar, do you have a bug to suggest changes under?