What mail storage type were you using? I've been testing mdbox on gluster and when I put a lot of load on it using more than one thread I see lots of corruption problems, both in the index files which store flag information and in the data storage also. This doesn't happen on a local filesystem but I can duplicate it with one dovecot server talking to one gluster server. 2012/3/15 Jure Koren (Uninet) <jure.koren+gluster at uninet.si> > I am running gluster with dovecot and postfix on two active/active > servers and it is working relatively OK. > > Sometimes I get an index corrupted message in the mail.err log, but it's > nothing serious. I've had an issue once when files were marked as bad and > got tons of input/output errors, but I managed to solve it by removing the > files from the background storage on one node and deleting extented > attributes on the other node. > > Jure > > > On 15.3.2012 13:47, Tiago A. Pe?anha wrote: > > Hello, > I've been reading a lot of posts of dovecot implementation on clustered > filesystems, while my first option was DRDB, I was suggested to take a look > at glusterfs for my scenario. > > Basically I'm considering a two server active-active scenario (or > active-passive at least), with mailboxes data replication. We have actually > 6,000 mailboxes and almost 300GB of data (and growing). > > I'm wondering...how had been your experience with glusterfs + > dovecot/postfix? > > I would appreciate any hints. > > Thanks, > Tiago > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing listGluster-users at gluster.orghttp://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20120409/7f4a9411/attachment.htm>
