Sorry for a stupid question, but would there be issues using glusterfs based on several 11 TB ext4-bricks? /jon On 09/24/2011 09:26 PM, Anand Babu Periasamy wrote: > On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Liam Slusser <lslusser at gmail.com > <mailto:lslusser at gmail.com>> wrote: > > I have a very large, >500tb, Gluster cluster on Centos Linux but I > use the XFS filesystem in a production role. Each xfs filesystem > (brick) is around 32tb in size. No problems all runs very well. > > ls > > Yes XFS is the way to go for large partitions > 16TB (or even 12TB). > XFS is brought back to life by Red Hat. Most of the XFS developers are > now RH employees. We can confidently recommend XFS now. > > -- > Anand Babu Periasamy > Blog [ http://www.unlocksmith.org ] > Twitter [ http://twitter.com/abperiasamy ] > > Imagination is more important than knowledge --Albert Einstein > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20110925/8c9ab127/attachment.htm>
