tuning gluster performance vs. nfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I have been tweaking and researching for a while now and can't seem to
get "good" performance out of Gluster.

I'm using Gluster to replace an NFS server (c1.xlarge) that serves
files to an array of web servers, all in EC2. In my tests Gluster is
significantly slower than NFS on average. I'm using a distributed
replicated volume on two (m1.large) bricks:

Volume Name: ebs
Type: Replicate
Status: Started
Number of Bricks: 2
Transport-type: tcp
Bricks:
Brick1: 10....:/mnt/ebs
Brick2: 10....:/mnt/ebs
Options Reconfigured:
performance.io-thread-count: 64
performance.cache-refresh-timeout: 60
performance.cache-size: 6GB

The web servers are serving pages built with eZ Publish, a CMS that
reads a lot of small files to build a page. I'm benchmarking with
siege. Here are some sample results I'm getting:

With NFS, siege request concurrency 5:
Lifting the server siege...      done.
Transactions:		         271 hits
Availability:		      100.00 %
Elapsed time:		       61.60 secs
Data transferred:	        3.11 MB
Response time:		        1.12 secs
Transaction rate:	        4.40 trans/sec
Throughput:		        0.05 MB/sec
Concurrency:		        4.95
Successful transactions:         271
Failed transactions:	           0
Longest transaction:	        2.45
Shortest transaction:	        0.84

More NFS, concurrency 20:
Lifting the server siege...      done.
Transactions:		         857 hits
Availability:		      100.00 %
Elapsed time:		       85.56 secs
Data transferred:	        9.84 MB
Response time:		        1.97 secs
Transaction rate:	       10.02 trans/sec
Throughput:		        0.11 MB/sec
Concurrency:		       19.76
Successful transactions:         857
Failed transactions:	           0
Longest transaction:	        6.53
Shortest transaction:	        1.15

And with Gluster, concurrency 5:
Lifting the server siege...      done.
Transactions:		          75 hits
Availability:		      100.00 %
Elapsed time:		       61.26 secs
Data transferred:	        0.63 MB
Response time:		        3.96 secs
Transaction rate:	        1.22 trans/sec
Throughput:		        0.01 MB/sec
Concurrency:		        4.85
Successful transactions:          75
Failed transactions:	           0
Longest transaction:	        4.64
Shortest transaction:	        3.54

More Gluster, concurrency 20:
Lifting the server siege...      done.
Transactions:		         139 hits
Availability:		      100.00 %
Elapsed time:		       84.96 secs
Data transferred:	        1.16 MB
Response time:		       11.53 secs
Transaction rate:	        1.64 trans/sec
Throughput:		        0.01 MB/sec
Concurrency:		       18.86
Successful transactions:         139
Failed transactions:	           0
Longest transaction:	       16.14
Shortest transaction:	       10.01

Any ideas how I can improve Gluster's performance?

Ryan Williams


[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux