On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Steve Wilson <stevew at purdue.edu> wrote: > We had trouble with reliability for small, actively-accessed files on a > distribute-replicate volume in both GlusterFS 3.11 and 3.12. ?It seems that > the replicated servers would eventually get out of sync with each other on > these kinds of files. ?For a while, we dropped replication and only ran the > volume as distributed. ?This has worked reliably for the past week or so > without any errors that we were seeing before: no such file, invalid > argument, etc. I'm running thousands of small files over NFSv3 through NGINX with distribute and have had the opposite experience. Unfortunately when NGINX can't access a file over NFS it means a customer calling us, so right now gluster is basically sitting idle (posted my output to the list a while back with no response). Cheers Kon
