@Joseph: Come again please? I didn't quite catch what you wanted to tell me. @Whit: Thank you, that was very helpful. Regards -- David Pusch Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig) On Mittwoch, 10. August 2011 at 15:56, Joe Landman wrote: > On 08/10/2011 08:22 AM, David Pusch wrote: > > Hello again, > > we now did another test where we mounted the Volume on the client and > > shut down all Servers but one. We then transferred a 1 GB test file to > > the Volume. The transfer took around 10 seconds. We then brought up > > another server from the Cluster and again transferred a 1 GB file. > > Transfer time now was roughly 20 seconds. We proceeded in this manner > > for the last two servers, and each time the transfer time increased by > > ca. 10 seconds. > > I hope someone can make sense of this and maybe help with this problem. > > Replica 6 and a gigabit network, where each brick is communicating with > clients and other bricks via the same single gigabit network. > > This performance is designed in (to the network design, not gluster's > design). It shouldn't be surprising to you. > > > > -- > Joseph Landman, Ph.D > Founder and CEO > Scalable Informatics, Inc. > email: landman at scalableinformatics.com (mailto:landman at scalableinformatics.com) > web : http://scalableinformatics.com > http://scalableinformatics.com/sicluster > phone: +1 734 786 8423 x121 > fax : +1 866 888 3112 > cell : +1 734 612 4615 > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org (mailto:Gluster-users at gluster.org) > http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20110810/fc6cdd86/attachment.htm>
