Hardware being best, what's better between software and gluster? On 9/23/2010 10:55 PM, Craig Carl wrote: > Jeremy - > The absolute best would be hardware RAID. If that isn't an option > mdadm (linux) is your better choice. > > Thanks, > > Craig > > -- > Craig Carl > Sales Engineer; Gluster, Inc. > Cell - (408) 829-9953 <about:blank> (California, USA) > Office - (408) 770-1884 <about:blank> > Gtalk - craig.carl at gmail.com > Twitter - @gluster > Installing Gluster Storage Platform, the movie! > <http://www.youtube.com/user/GlusterStorage> > http://rackerhacker.com/2010/08/11/one-month-with-glusterfs-in-production/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From: *"Jeremy Enos" <jenos at ncsa.uiuc.edu> > *To: *gluster-users at gluster.org > *Sent: *Thursday, September 23, 2010 12:13:25 PM > *Subject: *linux raid0 vs gluster raid0 > > Suppose I've got 5 disks in a system connected to my IB network, and I > want to host a Gluster filesystem on it for max I/O (large block, > multiple client). > Should I raid0 the 5 disks at the linux level, or the gluster level? > thx- > > Jeremy > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
