Hi, > Mathieu - > Gluster will work well for you, I would suggest you start testing > with the Gluster NFS option in Gluster 3.1, it sounds like you could > use some of the advantages that NFS client side caching gets you. > <http://www.gluster.com/community/documentation/index.php/Main_Page> In my case, as I want to avoid (if possible) to have a disk-serving cluster, this means accesing the local gluster volume via NFS. Do you mean that this would be better than using Fuse ? If I had to setup a failover disk cluster shared via NFS - that would mean handling IP failover using heartbeat (or something similar) - right ? Thanks for the recommandation ! Mathieu
