Thanx, James! Is there any solution for such kind of problems? I do not like idea to have 4 connections to each server from each client in each DC instead of this scheme. 5 ??????? 2010 ?. 17:12 ???????????? Burnash, James <jburnash at knight.com>???????: > Hi Alex - ?????? ???? (?? ??????? ???? ?????) > > The problem with replication on both the server and the client is that the > server does not (I believe) have an awareness of what the client is doing. I > did post a thread asking about best practices for replication (I was leaning > towards server side to keep that traffic local), and was told that client > side replication was recommended and supported. > > I think you're seeing corruption on your copies because both the client and > the server are replicating. > > Also - the reason you didn't get an email directly from me last time was > that I only send to the list unless requested otherwise. I'm copying you > directly this time. > > Thanks, > > James Burnash, Unix Engineering > > -- ????? ? ????????? ?? ????? ???, ????? ??? ?????????..
