Hmm, seems this thread is dead now. That's pity. No statement from the developers about usability of glusterfs client on 32bit systems. But this was probably discussed in earlier threads. I think I'll use NFS with UCARP for the production environment. What about the performance loss if using NFS instead of GlusterFS, any experiences? On Monday 15 November 2010 14:41:23 Christian Fischer wrote: > On Monday 15 November 2010 14:27:34 Stefano Baronio wrote: > > Yes, please, share it with us. > > I've succesfully compiled the rpm packages, but the client is not giving > > any errors when it is not able to connect to a glusterfs share... > > That's normal, the native client exits (as far i've seen) always true. > That is an issue of cleanup_and_exit() if debug is off. > > Christian > > > Thanks > > Stefano > > > > > > 2010/11/13 Dennis Schafroth <dennis at schafroth.dk> > > > > > On 12/11/2010, at 18.51, Ken Bigelow wrote: > > > > We have all 32bit server / clients for Gluster. We did have to > > > > compile it from source but so far we have had no problems at all. > > > > > > > > A few things had to be tweaked inside the configuration files like > > > > io thread count and whatnot but in the end it seems to be working > > > > fine from what we can tell. > > > > > > Can you share what you have done? I am running a test on small 32 bit > > > boxes > > > > > > cheers, > > > > > > :-Dennis Schafroth > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Gluster-users mailing list > > > Gluster-users at gluster.org > > > http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
