Setup for production - which one would you choose?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/22/2010 06:59 PM, Oliver Hoffmann wrote:

> The next step is deploying a system which could be used for
> production. What would you suggest? Ubuntu 10.4 (server 64bit) is my
> first choice because of LTS. Whatsoever, I think it is more the version
> of glusterfs which makes it stable or not, isn't it?
> In the end I'd like to have a distributed&  replicated storage which
> provides data for a bunch of (virtualized) LAMPS.

 From what i understand, Gluster is developed and tested internally on 
CentOS, so that may be a consideration as well.


-- 
Daniel Maher <dma+gluster AT witbe DOT net>


[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux