lol, and we have nothing to do with the cathedral or Dom Koelsch either. But having DomUs on glusterfs would be nice though, if possible. Greetings, Oliver > off topic .. > > Just happened to look at your website, in the hope it had something > to do with virtualization ( DomU :-) ). Like the way the Management > and Strategy tab is done :-) .. pretty creative ( a little slow to > pop up though .. ). > > Regards, > Tejas. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Oliver Hoffmann" <oh at dom.de> > To: gluster-users at gluster.org > Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 11:29:25 PM GMT +05:30 Chennai, Kolkata, > Mumbai, New Delhi Subject: Setup for production - > which one would you choose? > > Hi all, > > I just made some tests on two old machines using Ubuntu 10.4 (server > i386) with fuse-2.7.4glfs11 and glusterfs-3.0.3. At a first glance it > seems to be OK. > The next step is deploying a system which could be used for > production. What would you suggest? Ubuntu 10.4 (server 64bit) is my > first choice because of LTS. Whatsoever, I think it is more the > version of glusterfs which makes it stable or not, isn't it? > In the end I'd like to have a distributed & replicated storage which > provides data for a bunch of (virtualized) LAMPS. > > TIA for your recommendations! > > Regards, > > Oliver Hoffmann > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >