On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Mike Terzo <mterzo at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Harshavardhana <harsha at gluster.com> wrote: > > On 03/02/2010 05:27 AM, Mike Terzo wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Harshavardhana<harsha at gluster.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I'm guessing you are talking about this patch: > >>>>>>> http://patches.gluster.com/patch/2659/ or is there another one? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Yes thats the patch can you patch it and use it?. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Tests are looking good so far, I haven't done a long test yet. I'll > >>>> let you know how that goes, I'm gonna let it run for a few days. > >>>> > >> > >> My test code, is simply create a bunch of directories, remove a bunch > >> of directories, over and over and over. The memory of process stays > >> consistent, however for some reason directories are not being removed > >> completely. After I do a pass of removing a bunch of directories the > >> next pass of create fails, because the previous directories weren't > >> removed. > >> > >> --mike terzo > >> > > > > It could be a fuse bug. Are you getting "Device Resource or Busy" or > "File > > Exists" errors. What is the fuse version under use? > > > > [2010-02-26 13:51:56] N [fuse-bridge.c:3017:fuse_init] glusterfs-fuse: > FUSE inited with protocol versions: glusterfs 7.13 kernel 7.11 > > The problem only occurs with the patch. What is the patch are you referring here?
