Am 19.07.2010 17:10, schrieb Roland Rabben: > I did try that on one of the clients. I removed all performance > translators except io-threads. No imporovement. > The server still use a hughe ammount of CPU. 36*8 = 288 threads alone for IO. I don't know specifics about GlusterFS but common knowledge suggests high thread counts are bad. You end up using all your CPU waiting for locks and in context switches. Why do you export each disk seperately? You don't seem to care about disk failure so you could put all disks in one LVM VG and export LVs from that. cheers Paul > > Roland > > 2010/7/19 Andre Felipe Machado<andremachado at techforce.com.br>: >> Hello, >> Did you try to minimize or even NOT use any cache? >> With so many nodes, the cache coherency between them may had become an issue... >> Regards. >> Andre Felipe Machado >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gluster-users mailing list >> Gluster-users at gluster.org >> http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >> >> > > >
