I/O fair share to avoid I/O bottlenecks on small clsuters

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Can you tell us a little more about your setup? I'm running many 
hundreds of vms on our cluster but I found infiniband is necessary if 
you have any large amount of io (databases, lots of drive access etc).

You may simply be saturating your io if you only have a single gigabit 
interface to your storage. Things like NFS mount can direct all your io 
down one gig link and can be the death knell to your distributed 
parallel filer.

-Mic

Ran wrote:
> Hi ,
> I recently posted an issue regarding a situation that happen when
> say 1 virtual machine images takes down the entire server IO
> then the entire storage become slow in such way that noting work
> emails , web etc...
> gluster gays posted that virtual machine is a main goal of the storage
> and that they probebly implement a fair share IO options to avoid this cases .
>
> Can anyone tell me what are the plans for this , it apear to me that
> this is 1 of the most important issues on such storage seens it is not
> possible to run more then a few virtual machins in parallel .
>
> Many thanks ,
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>   



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux