Yeah im waiting for Gluster to come out with a 3.0.1 release before i upgrade. I'll make sure to do my best to compare 3.0.1 with OneFS's performance/recovery/etc once i upgrade. I still have two Isilon clusters which aren't in production anymore in our lab i can play around with. And i've been waiting for brfs for awhile now, it can't come soon enough! thanks, liam On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Harshavardhana <harsha at gluster.com> wrote: > Hi Liam, > GlusterFS does checksum based self-heal since the 3.0 release, i would > believe your experiences are from 2.0? which has issues of doing a full file > self-heal which will a lot of time.? But i would suggest an upgrade with > 3.0.1 > release which is due Feb 1st week for your cluster. 3.x releases with new > self-heal you should get very less rebuild times. If its possible to compare > the > 3.0.1 rebuild times with the One-FS from Isilon should help us improve it > too. > > Thanks \> > I would suggest wait for "brtfs".
