Il giorno 05/gen/2010, alle ore 21.29, Roland Rabben ha scritto: > Hi > I have now tested Glusterfs 3.0 on a different system with the same > self-heal problems I experienced in 2.0.6. > > To summarize: > I use cluster/replicate and cluster/distribute > Brick 1 on server 1 gets replicated to brick 1 on server 2. > Brick 2 on server 1 gets replicated to brick 2 on server 2. etc... > > If I delete a file called "movie.avi" from a brick behind Glusterfs back on > server 2, self-heal works fine with the "ls -lR" command. > > If I delete a file called "movie.avi" from a brick behind Glusterfs back on > server 1, self-heal with "ls -lR" doesn't work. > > If I delete a file called "movie.avi" from a brick behind Glusterfs back on > server 1, self-heal with "ls -lR movie.avi" works. > > So for self-heal to work properly you need to specify the missing file. I > wonder how many do that? I think most people run "ls -lR" thinking > everything will be fine. I don't think running "ls -lR" is a great idea, and I hope there are plans to change it. d.
