Hi, I have noticed that the glusterfsd initscript (for redhat, at least) ships with sequence defaults of S90 & K12. I think this is WAY off. This is a filesystem which may potentially be hosting critical services, surely it needs to come up along side NFS or earlier? I would expect values of about 50 to be the default. Can anyone think of a reason why glusterfsd should not be brought up as soon as possible, then down as late as possible? Thanks, Jeff.
