It has to be said, though I'm suffering from major performance issues, I've found glusterfs to be stable and reliable. Perhaps a list of recommended hardware to run it on would be a good thing. > -----Original Message----- > From: gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org > [mailto:gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org] On Behalf Of Vijay Bellur > Sent: 05 October 2009 14:36 > To: Barry Jaspan > Cc: gluster-users at gluster.org > Subject: Re: Real interesting > > Barry Jaspan wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Vijay Bellur > <vijay at gluster.com> wrote: > > > >>>> Hello list . > >>>> > >>> I was just wondering if there is someone on this list that > >>> was able to run gluster servers (4 servers) for a complete 1 week > >>> without having 1 glusterfsd server crash for no good resone > >>> > >>> > >> Can you please share the configuration and workload that > you are using? We > >> have several servers that run for days without a problem. > >> > > > > Ummm.... "days"? Please tell me this is not the maximum extent of > > reliability we can expect from glusterfs. > > > > > It was with respect to the message from the OP. We have > several internal > glusterfs shares that have been working for months without a > problem :-) > > Thanks, > Vijay > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >
