DRBD like performance?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,
DRBD is faster because, among other things, it replicate byte blocks on disks,
whatever they are. A corrupted master will be simply replicated...
In order to try to improve glusterfs (metadata file level) performance one could
try NUFA first at client side and then server side replication.
NUFA is _very_ good to accelerate local writes and reads at distributed
configuration.
Maybe, such concepts could be developed to replication in future.
Regards.
Andre Felipe Machado
http://www.techforce.com.br


[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux