gfs vs nfs: abysmal performance difference

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Paolo Pisati wrote:
> Dear,
>
> we are evaluating Glusterfs as an alternative to NFS. I connected two
> boxes (a dell 2950 and a via epia)
> with a crossover cable: the via epia is the gfs server, the 2950 is the
> client, and both run freebsd 7.2.
>   
i forgot to say that i'm running glusterfs-2.0.0, and that my setup is:

client:

LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/lib -liconv
CFLAGS=-O -I/usr/local/include/

./configure -enable-fuse-client --prefix=/usr/local/gfs
[snip]
GlusterFS configure summary
===========================
FUSE client        : yes
Infiniband verbs   : no
epoll IO multiplex : no
Berkeley-DB        : no
libglusterfsclient : no
mod_glusterfs      : no ()
argp-standalone    : yes

server:

CFLAGS=-O

./configure --prefix=/usr/local/gfs
[snip]
GlusterFS configure summary
===========================
FUSE client        : no
Infiniband verbs   : no
epoll IO multiplex : no
Berkeley-DB        : no
libglusterfsclient : no
mod_glusterfs      : no ()
argp-standalone    : yes


-- 

Paolo Pisati
Reparto Sistemi
---------
ContactLab
Via Natale Battaglia, 10
20127 Milano (Italy)
Tel. +39 02 28 31 181
Fax +39 02 70 03 02 69.
http://www.contactlab.com




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux