On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:55:23 +0800 Andy Sy <andy.sy at neotitans.com> wrote: > ... because imagine how people would react to having to > use a command called 'glusterfsck' > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users Really, I cannot feel the kidding. Every fsck that works while the data is online is very welcome. No matter if we talk about glusterfs or any other fs. The real problem of linux today is the offline fsck with cryptic output. In times of TBs of data being offline is a no-go. This is what makes glusterfs the most important project throughout the community. It _solves_ a really urgent problem (when it performs stable). btrfs btw solves only already solved problems... no idea why it hypes. -- Regards, Stephan
