----- "Andy Sy" <andy.sy at neotitans.com> wrote: > In the sample config for a 2-server mirror setup at: > > http://gluster.org/docs/index.php/Automatic_File_Replication_(Mirror)_across_Two_Storage_Servers > > both volumes are considered remote and use > tcp as transport-type. If you intend to use > a local volume as one of the 2 servers in a > mirrored setup, is there any advantage in defining > glusterfs.vol as below? There'll be a slight performance advantage since it will avoid the local (loopback) network latency. Vikas -- Engineer - http://gluster.com/
