My thinking is both on the client so: I AFR my nodes. I then DHT my AFR bricks. I then mount the DHT vols. Or would I get better performance the other way around? ________________________________ From: Kirby Zhou [mailto:kirbyzhou at sohu-rd.com] Sent: 14 July 2009 17:51 To: Hiren Joshi; gluster-users at gluster.org Subject: RE: DHT with AFR Which do you want to get? AFR based on DHT or DHT based on AFR? From: gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org [mailto:gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org] On Behalf Of Hiren Joshi Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 12:31 AM To: gluster-users at gluster.org Subject: DHT with AFR Hi all, I'm looking to create a system where all nodes are mirrored with at least one other node (using afr) but I also want it to be fully scalable (that is to say I can add another mirrored pair at any point to the system). Will AFR with DHT do what I want? Are there any problems/caveats with this setup that I should know about? What have been your experiences? Thanks, Josh. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://zresearch.com/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20090714/ef39462a/attachment.htm>
