Markus, If you can remember the steps which caused this problem can you try to create the problem again? Thanks Krishna On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Markus Gerstner <m.gerstner at bmiag.de> wrote: > Hi Krishna, > > the servers have been restarted before this bug occurred, yes. Files in the directory in question have not been modified since the restart. > However, as I just noticed, the creation time on the directory is "fixed" when it's updated, e.g. you create a new file inside the directory. > > Markus > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: krishna.zresearch at gmail.com [mailto:krishna.zresearch at gmail.com] On >> Behalf Of Krishna Srinivas >> Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 11:41 AM >> To: Markus Gerstner >> Cc: gluster-users at gluster.org >> Subject: Re: AFR'd Namespace sets creation time on >> directory to 1970 >> >> Hi Markus, >> >> Did you do anything to get that problem? i.e bring a server down , create >> a new file etc? I am trying to see what steps caused this bug. >> >> Krishna >> >> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Markus Gerstner <m.gerstner at bmiag.de> >> wrote: >> > Heya Mailing-List, >> > >> > we're using an AFR'd Namespace with one subvolume on each server in the >> FS, client-configuration as follows: >> > volume backup-afr-ns >> > type cluster/afr >> > subvolumes backup-ns1 backup-ns2 backup-ns3 backup-ns4 >> > end-volume >> > >> > The namespace-volumes are stored on XFS, clients and servers use debian. >> XFS is mounted with "noatime"-Option. >> > Data-Volumes are stored on ext3 with noatime and user_xattr. >> > >> > We set it up like that to ensure redundancy on the namespace without >> being dependant on the clients. Maybe this is not the proper way to use a >> namespace, if so, please let me know. >> > >> > Should it be the proper way, I'd like to ask why the date on one >> directory suddenly changed to 1970-01-01. The date is still correct in the >> data-volumes of the servers but set to 1970 on all servers' namespace- >> volumes. Unfortunately, the "fix" from the devel-mailinglist, using "head >> -1 * > /dev/null" does not apply here for obvious reasons. >> > >> > Is there a way to resync the namespace and reset the date or - even >> better - a way to prevent this from happening again? :-) >> > >> > Regards, >> > Markus >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Gluster-users mailing list >> > Gluster-users at gluster.org >> > http://zresearch.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >> > > >