On Thursday 13 November 2008 20:43:10 Keith Freedman wrote: > At 04:54 AM 11/13/2008, KwangErn Liew wrote: > >2008/11/7 Rash <rash at konto.pl> > > > >pi? , 07 lis 2008, 15:35:48 +0530, Anand Avati napisa??(a): > > > Most of us use 2.7.3glfs10 > > > >Is this module only or library or both? > > > > > >Am guessin' it's both. > > > >Am afraid that FUSE can be the culprit for > >potential bugs in GlusterFS. It'd be best if > >there's a recommended and standardised use of a particular FUSE version. > > I believe he was telling you that 2.7.3glfs10 is > the recommended and standardised FUSE version. > > you can download it form gluster's website. > > I'd prefer gluster work with the latest version > that's distributed with the operating systems. > but gluster doesn't seem to play well with fuse 2.7.4 which I see as a > problem. the dev's need to start testing with the latest > version of FUSE, because presumably it fixes bugs > that are present in 2.7.3 and possibly has other enhancements. > > locking us into an older version , even if it's "optimized" isn't a good > idea. > I'll try to produce a patch for 2.7.4 by the end of the week. Marian
