glusterfs performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:37 PM, Graeme <graeme at sudo.ca> wrote:

> KwangErn Liew wrote:
> > The Debian package is slightly outdated. 1.3.12 is the latest stable
> > with fixes and improvements. It'd be good if you can benchmark 1.4.x
> > as well for it has lots of architectural changes/improvements
> > (supposedly).
>
> These are good points. The problem with that is that I'm not keep to
> roll out a solution into production that isn't marked as stable (1.4.x),
> or that I can't keep track of with the package management system
> (1.3.12). I'll see if I can roll some packages of 1.3.12 at least, and
> retry my AFR benchmark.
>

Rolling out 1.4.x is safer than 1.3.x when 1.4 gets to stable. At the
moment, it's in QA, so it should be out in a month or so. :)

1.3.x has some serious problems ala split-brain
http://www.gluster.org/docs/index.php/Understanding_AFR_Translator#Split_Brain


KwangErn
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://zresearch.com/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20080919/976bf8e4/attachment.htm 


[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux