Is it safe to lower SHARD_MIN_BLOCK_SIZE?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I'm trying to investigate a few issues found on disperse volumes with sharding
enabled (https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/1148 for example). Since
testing on huge files may be slow and consume a lot of system resources, I'm
trying to scale SHARD_MIN_BLOCK_SIZE down to very small values, say 4K, and
use 1-4M files for testing. Since this tweak doesn't break replica 3 volumes,
I expect that it should be valid for disperse volumes as well. Is that so?

Dmitry
_______________________________________________

Community Meeting Calendar:

Schedule -
Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 14:30 IST / 09:00 UTC
Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/441850968




Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Ceph Users]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux