On Fri, 12 Jul 2019 at 21:14, Niels de Vos <ndevos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 01:02:48PM +0530, Hari Gowtham wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We came across an build issue with release 5.7. It was related the
> python version.
> A fix for it ha been posted [ https://review.gluster.org/#/c/glusterfs/+/23028 ]
> Once we take this fix in we need to go ahead with tagging and release it.
> Though we have tagged 5.7, we weren't able to package 5.7 because of this issue.
>
> Now the question is, to create 5.7.1 or go with 5.8 as recreating a
> tag isn't an option.
> My take is to create 5.8 and mark 5.7 obsolete. And the reasons are as below:
> *) We have moved on to using 5.x. Going back to 5.x.y will be confusing.
> *) 5.8 is also due as we got delayed a lot in this issue.
>
> If we have any other opinion, please let us know so we can decide and
> go ahead with the best option.
I would go with 5.7.1. However if 5.8 would be tagged around the same
time, then only do 5.8.
Since 5.8 is nearing, lets do 5.8 instead of 5.7.1?
Niels
_______________________________________________
Community Meeting Calendar:
APAC Schedule -
Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 11:30 AM IST
Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/836554017
NA/EMEA Schedule -
Every 1st and 3rd Tuesday at 01:00 PM EDT
Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/486278655
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
- Atin (atinm)
_______________________________________________ Community Meeting Calendar: APAC Schedule - Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 11:30 AM IST Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/836554017 NA/EMEA Schedule - Every 1st and 3rd Tuesday at 01:00 PM EDT Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/486278655 Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
